نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
Constructive interaction between freedom of expression and the right to criticize plays a vital role in ensuring accountability, transparency, and, ultimately, the effectiveness of governmental systems, including Islamic government. Despite the theoretical significance of these concepts in Islamic thought, how to develop an effective model of interaction that strengthens the foundations of government and advances the public interest remains a matter of debate requiring systematic investigation. This study proposes an ideal model of interaction between freedom of expression and the right to constructive criticism within Islamic government, focusing
on enhancing governmental effectiveness. The central research question is: What key components and mechanisms constitute an ideal model of interaction between freedom of expression and the right to constructive criticism that enhances the effectiveness of Islamic government? Using a descriptive-analytical method, the study examines the theoretical and jurisprudential foundations of this interaction and its practical requirements. The findings indicate that the proposed model rests on the principles of mutual accountability between rulers and citizens, the distinction between constructive and destructive criticism, information transparency, and the legal protection of critics. Its implementation requires institutionalizing formal and informal channels for receiving criticism, fostering a culture of receptiveness to criticism among public officials, and establishing clear legal frameworks to safeguard responsible freedom of expression. Achieving effective Islamic government depends on developing and institutionalizing a dynamic, balanced model of interaction between freedom of expression and the right to constructive criticism. Such a model should protect legitimate freedoms while harnessing criticism to address shortcomings, improve public affairs, and enhance governance.
کلیدواژهها English
