نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار، گروه علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد شهرضا، شهرضا، اصفهان، ایران
2 دانشجوی دکترای علوم سیاسی، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی شهرضا، شهرضا، اصفهان، ایران.
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The current study seeks to investigate different theories on bureaucracy to determine their pros and cons. Considering the background of bureaucracy in the history of Iran and Islamic revolution, this article discussed that which type of bureaucracy is more compatible with ethical and cultural models relying on revolution as well as developmental criteria in the country. The theory of developed bureaucracy proposed in this article attempted to serve significant assistance to political economy and development in accordance with Islamic-Iranian models. Furthermore, with an interactive approach to development theories, correlation between dependence and bureaucracy as well as political, economic, and management viewpoints, it was tried to determine the complexities of bilateral impacts of bureaucracy and development. The results of the study showed that negative perceptions and inefficiencies have institutionalized many negative beliefs about bureaucracy. Therefore, we should replace it with by practical reform toward development so that bureaucracy give service to the development of society rather than society giving service to the development of bureaucracy. Efficient bureaucratic system in society can be achieved by paying attention to the ethical and moral aspects in human being.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
10. میشلس، روبرت (1392). جامعه‌شناسی احزاب سیاسی؛ مطالعه‌ای در مورد گرایش‌های الیگارشی در دموکراسی‌ها. ترجمه احمد نقیب‌زاده. تهران: نشر قومس.
11. وبر، ماکس (1373). اخلاق پروتستانی و روح سرمایه‌داری. ترجمه عبدالکریم رشیدیان و پریسا منوچهری کاشانی. تهران: انتشارات علمی و فرهنگی.
12. وبر، ماکس (1394). دین، قدرت، جامعه. ترجمه احمد تدین. تهران: انتشارات هرمس.
13. Albrow, Martin (1989). Bureaucracy. London: Macmillan.
14. Albrow, Martin (1996). The Global Age State and Socity Beyond Modernity. Cambridge: policy Press.
15. Apter, David (1965). The Politics of Modernization. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
16. Berger, B. K. & Meng, J. (2010). Public relations practitioners and the leadership challenge. The SAGE handbook of public relations, 2: P 421- 434.
17. Drucker, Peter. F. (1969). The age of Discontinutiy: Guidelines for changing society. Butterworth-Heinemann
18. Huntington, Samuel (1968). Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven: Yale university Press.
19. Pye, Lucian. (1967). Aspects of political Development. Boston: Little Brown.
)