نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
نویسنده
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسنده [English]
In a general explanation, the difference of intellectual schools of thoughts can be traced to differences in their “Anthropology”. In other words, intellectual bases and confrontations of an intellectual world with the real world can be due to understanding of that thought, of the concept of “human”. Hence, one of the best ways of analysis to understand the difference of schools of thought is comparative analysis of their “anthropology” and definitions they give for “human”. In this paper, it is tried to re-read the differences and oppositions in definition of “human” in three distinct thoughts of “Ancient Greece”, “Secular Thought”, and “Supreme (Mote’alieh) Hikmah” but due to the extensiveness of these three scopes, in addition to reducing the analysis to “anthropological” differences, one particular representative has been also introduced for each of the three aforementioned intellectual disciplines including: Plato and his philosophy in the domain of ancient Greece, Secularism as the dominant discourse of modern western thought, and viewpoints of Ayatollah Javadi Amoli concerning the supreme (Mote’alieh) Hikmah. Accordingly, this paper deals with comparing the philosophy of anthropology in view of Plato, Secularism Discourse and Ayatollah Javadi Amoli.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
10. طباطبایی، سید محمدحسین (1389). ترجمه تفسیر المیزان، ترجمه: حجهالاسلام محمدباقر موسوی همدانی، دوره‌ی 20 جلدی. قم: دفتر انتشارات اسلامی.
11. مطهری، مرتضی (1379). انسان کامل. تهران: صدرا.
12. نصر، سیدحسین (1382). صدالمتألهین شیرازی و حکمت متعالیه، ترجمه: حسین سوزنچی، تهران: دفتر پژوهش و نشر سهروردی.
1. Calhoun, Craig; Juergensmeyer, Mark; Antwerpen, Janathan. Rethinking Secularism, Oxford University Press, 2011.
2. Glen R Morrow, Platos’s Cretan City, Princeton University Press, 1993.
3. Klosko, George, The Development of Plato’s Political Theory, Oxford University Press, 2007.
4. Levine, Geotge, Realism, Ethics and Secularism – Essays on Victorian Literature and Science, Cambridge University Press, 2008.
5. Plato, Euthyphro, Apology, Crito, Phaedo, Phaedrus, Translated by Harlod North Fowler, Loeb Classical Library, Harvard University Press.
Sraus, Leo, The Arguments and the Action’s of Platos’s Laws, Chicago University Press, 1975.
)