Transcendent Policy

Transcendent Policy

Narrative and Social Imagination in the Historiography of the Qajar Era

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 PhD., Department of Political Science, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
2 Professor, Department of Political Science, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran
10.22034/sm.2025.560349.1925
Abstract
The present study examines narrative and social imagination in the historiography of the Qajar era. The fundamental question of this research is: what factor leads to different and sometimes contradictory understandings of historical events? It appears that addressing this question is feasible by focusing on the concept/theory of "narrative" in the thoughts of Hayden White and Paul Ric oeur. According to this theory, history is considered a refined memory in favor of constructing a collective past based on collective identity. Thus, memory is more related to the collective perception of historical events than to reality itself. Narrative, through the dual functions of "highlighting" certain events and "downplaying" or even omitting others, establishes a causal relationship among these events. Accordingly, it can be argued that narrative is the mechanism that determines the genre of history, whether tragic, victorious, epic, or satirical. This issue differentiates historiography from chronicles, which serve as mere records of events in historical calendars. Based on this theoretical framework, two narratives of modern Iranian history can be traced: one is the narrative of Iran’s historical decline in the social imagination of Iranians during the Qajar period, and the other is the narrative of stability and the formation of a modern state during the same historical period. Each of these narratives establishes different causal relationships among events in this timeframe, ultimately constructing different genres of decline and stability. A prime example of the first narrative can be found in the thoughts of Mirza Na’ini and his description of his historical context. The second narrative, which has been constructed in recent years, can be observed in the works of researchers such as Abbas Amanat and Naghmeh Sohrabi. This research is based on the premise that these two narratives are constructed and distinguished from each other through the primary mechanism of narrative, which involves both highlighting and overlooking specific historical events.
Keywords

آدمیت، فریدون (1388). فکر دموکراسی اجتماعی در نهضت مشروطیت ایران. تهران: انتشارات گستره.
حرّی، ابوالفضل (1400). درهم‌تنیدگی روایت و تاریخ در تاریخ بیهقی از منظر هایدن وایت. مطالعات و تحقیقات ادبی، 12(3): ص69-92.
ریکور، پل (1397). زمان و حکایت؛ پیرنگ و حکایت تاریخی . ترجمه مهشید نونهالی. تهران: نشر نی، ج1.
سهرابی، نغمه (1400). بازخوانی سفرنامه‌های اروپایی ایرانیان در عصر قاجار. ترجمه محمد سروی‌زرگر. تهران: نشر مرکز.
توکلی طرقی، محمد (1397). تجدد بومی و بازاندیشی تاریخ. تهران: نشر پردیس دانش.
میر، فردیک. دبلیو (1400). روایت و کنش جمعی. ترجمه الهام شوشتری‌زاده. تهران: نشر اطراف.
میلانی، عباس (1383). تجدد و تجددستیزی در ایران. تهران: نشر اختران.
نائینی، محمدحسین؛ طالقانی، سیدمحمود (1334). تنبیه‌الامّه و تنزیه الملّه یا حکومت از نظر اسلام. تهران: شرکت سهامی انتشار.
هنرمند، سعید (1398). بوطیقای ارسطو. تهران: نشر چشمه.
وحدت، فرزین (1395). رویارویی فکری ایرانیان با مدرنیت. ترجمه مهدی حقیقت‌خواه. تهران: انتشارات ققنوس.
Amanat, A. (1997). Pivot of the Universe; Nasir al-Din Shah and the Iranian Monarchy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Aristotle (1997). Poetics. Translated & edited by J.B. Atherto & G. Whalley. Montreal, Kingston, London & Buffalo: McGill-Queen's University Press.
Ricoeur, P. (1984). Time and Narrative (Vol. 1). Translated by K.M. Pellauer. Chicago & London: The Chicago University Press.
Tavakoli-Targhi, M. (2001). Refashioning Iran; Orientalism, Occidentalism and Historiography. Oxford: Palgrave (in association with St. Antony's College).
White, H. (1975). Metahistory; The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe. Baltimore & London: The Johns Hopkins University Press.
White, H. (2007). Guilty of History? The Longue Durée of Paul Ricoeur. The Journal of History and Theory, Vol. 46: p. 233-251.