نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی
عنوان مقاله English
نویسندگان English
While some contend that mysticism precludes engagement in politics and worldly governance for mystics, historical evidence suggests otherwise. An examination of mystics' involvement in political activities challenges the validity of such claims. This study explores the critique of political power in the thought and actions of two mystical figures from distinct periods of mysticism's prominence. Najm al-Dīn Rāzī and Imām Khomeinī both posit that the root of social crises lies in political power; thus, reforming political authority can resolve many societal issues. They argue that the estrangement of rulers from religion and piety opens avenues for corruption within political structures. The most exemplary government, in their view, is established by virtuous and devout individuals—a governance that not only ensures justice for the oppressed but also utilizes worldly dominion as a means for spiritual advancement. However, their approaches to political critique differ: Najm al-Dīn Rāzī, faced with the insecurity caused by Mongol invasions, chose flight over resistance and limited his reform efforts to authoring admonitory texts. In contrast, Imām Khomeinī actively warned against political corruption, employing speeches and declarations to mobilize others towards exposure, resistance, and struggle. He did not flee but stood firm, bearing the costs of resistance. For Imām Khomeinī, engaging in political struggle and assuming political power was not merely a social or human duty but a divine obligation, superseding many other religious duties incumbent upon every devout individual.
کلیدواژهها English
